Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01966
Original file (BC 2012 01966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01966 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was informed by the Department of Veterans Affairs that he 
never served in Vietnam. He had orders to show he was assigned 
temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam effective on or about 4 Feb 
68 for two days and on or about 12 Jun 68 for six days. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits his TDY orders. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 18 Jul 66, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 
On 17 Jul 70, he was honorably discharged. He served four years 
on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states that a review of the 
applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation 
submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in 
Vietnam. However, DPAPP was able to verify he had “boots on the 
ground” in the Republic of the Philippines from 4 Jan 67 and 
3 Jul 68. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 2 Jul 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The Board 
majority took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in 
judging the merits of the case; however, the Board majority 
agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopts its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. While the Board majority notes 
that the applicant has provided TDY orders to Hue Phu Bai, 
Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for two days in Feb 68 and Cam Rhan 
Bay, RVN, for six days in Jun 68, we do not find this evidence 
sufficient to substantiate his claim that he actually was TDY to 
these locations. However, should the applicant provide evidence 
to substantiate his claim, i.e., travel vouchers, we would be 
willing to reconsider his request. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, the Board majority finds no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 20 Feb 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

By majority vote, the Board voted to deny the application. voted 
to correct the record and desires to submit a minority report. 
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01966: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 21 Jun 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit F. Minority Report, dated ? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 


 

 

AFBCMR BC-2012-01966 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD 

 FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) 

 

SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of 

 

 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board 
members. The majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of error or 
injustice and recommends the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that 
relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that the application be denied. 

 

 Please advise the applicant accordingly. 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 


 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD 
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) 

 

SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket No: BC-2012-01966 

 

 I have carefully considered all the facts and circumstances of this case and do not agree 
with the majority members of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. 

 

 The majority of the panel is not convinced that the applicant’s record should be corrected 
to reflect Vietnam service. However, I note that the applicant has provided original temporary 
duty (TDY) orders to Hue Phu Bai, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for two days in Feb 68 and Cam 
Rhan Bay, RVN, for six days in Jun 68. 

 

 Although the travel orders provided by the applicant are not definite proof he performed 
the TDYs, I believe he should be afforded the benefit of the doubt. 

. 

 

 Therefore, in the interest of justice, I believe it appropriate to correct his record to reflect 
Vietnam service as indicated above. Please advise the applicant accordingly. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01966

    Original file (bc-2012-01966.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. In support of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he has provided the original temporary duty (TDY) orders assigning him from Clark Air Base, the Philippines, to Hue Phu Bai, RVN for two days in February 1968 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01558

    Original file (BC 2014 01558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73 in the area of eligibility (AOE). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00212

    Original file (BC-2012-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 1961 and 28 Mar 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01952

    Original file (BC-2012-01952.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given written military orders to report for 29 days temporary duty (TDY) at Cam Rahn Bay Air Base (AB), South Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records (MPR) and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that would substantiate Foreign Service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ 2 , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01952 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350

    Original file (BC 2013 04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03707

    Original file (BC-2012-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided, a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to the RVN cannot be confirmed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01561

    Original file (BC 2014 01561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01561 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough review of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1999-01621

    Original file (BC-1999-01621.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01621 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 12, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal. ...